http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10869
--- Comment #33 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #32) > Well, you may be right ;-) > I thought it was a good thing to have as less parameters as possible, to > make the code in .pl files more simple. But it was maybe a bad idea, for > performance reasons. > The code without this followup was working well (not sure it is still the > case), and was signed off. Paul failed QA in comment 17, but I answer him in > comment 19. > If you think the followup is not needed, I can obsolete it, and put back the > bug in "Signed off" state. I would suggest to combine them, since the followup also includes a unit test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
