http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9016
--- Comment #83 from Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivila...@jns.fi> --- (In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #82) > Olli, > Since this is a larger set of patches, it could be helpful while reviewing > it to know what you exactly tested when signing off? > Is it possible to elaborate on that? > Thanks in advance.. Wow, this is a big guestion. Basically I followed the test plan for this bug and for each dependant bug. Verifying from the SQL-client that data is preserved and the described database changes happen. I didn't do any Perl::Critic runs, as I am not very familiar with those and I get pretty uncontrolled results with it :) We are using this featureset in our semi-production server and have uncovered some bugs and subsequently reported them in other bug entries (which Joubu has promptly fixed). Unfortunately I didn't keep track of the test paths I took, but I can guarantee I didn't reach a 100% test coverage. Maybe 70% for this patch + the critical path. Tho I would applaud a unified Koha testing methodology to be adopted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/