http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8868

Galen Charlton <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Passed QA                   |Failed QA

--- Comment #29 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> ---
The second patch is weird -- it doesn't just remove CancelReserveFromId, it has
the effect of *changing* CancelReserve:

- it adds a return that no callers actually check
- more importantly, it removes the code to insert the old hold into
old_reserves, which is a pretty clear regression.

I'm marking failed QA on this basis.

I strongly encourage starting the patch over from scratch; a patch that adds a
routine that then gets immediately removed by its follow-up is confusing, at
the very least, and risks whatever merge reconciliation failure happened here. 
In particular, I don't see that it is necessary to touch C4/Reserves.pm at all
to implement this change; if there are concerns about CancelReserve's behavior,
that should go into a separate bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to