http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11846
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #13 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- > I tested both db revisions by resetting Version of my database (and > adding a SetVersion after the revised older dbrev). This was possible since > the debarred field still exists in borrowers. (I have my doubts about that, > but that goes outside the scope of this report.) Yes, borrower.debarred was retained for both speed and the fact that we wouldn't need to modify all the code that checks this field. > Also note that routine _UpdateBorrowerDebarmentFlags puts back 9999-12-31 > into borrowers for indefinite debarments (which looks not very consistent). Agreed, but again this is due to the extended feature being "backwards compatible" with the original debarment system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
