http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11051
M. de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #28 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #27) > There are 2 reasons. > 1/ I don't see the load difference following the test plan. > 2/ There are some calls to > memoize_memcached('subroutine_name', memcached => C4::Context->memcached); > in the code. > If the call is wrong, we should fix it everywhere. If I am wrong, I am not > able to pass qa on it :) I installed memcached (and ..) and ran the memoize_memcached call for GetMarcStructure and called it in a for loop so many times. My findings are: 1) As Jonathan pointed out, the call seems to be wrong. If I pass memcached =>1 as parameter, I also have: Invalid memcached argument (expected a hash). If I pass memcached => {}, it seems to be okay. I do not understand why we still find this error. Are other people using another version for memcached, Cache::Memcached or Memoize::Memcached? 2) When I increase the number of loops (calls to GetMarcStructure), I also see that the memcache variant is much slower. Since I am not yet that familiar with memcached, I am not sure if this is just a matter of configuration. I would appreciate some more feedback from the author or other users of memcached. I will send a mail to the dev list. Changing status to reflect the need for clarification. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
