http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4045

--- Comment #67 from Christopher Brannon <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #66)
> I don't think this should fail qa for not being a complete fix. A partial
> fix is better than no fix at all!
> 
> Kyle
> 
> (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #65)
> > Got the sandbox to work this time around.
> > 
> > The limit works great for individually placed holds, but still gives no
> > warning and places holds over limit if holding multiple items.
> > 
> > Christopher

I respectfully disagree.  You placed the multi-hold as a test condition.

> 9) Attempt to place 3 or more holds as a multi-hold

The patch does not pass your test.  If the patch is only to test items placed
on hold one at a time, then it works just fine.  I don't think this should
pass, based on your parameters.

Christopher

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to