http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12287
--- Comment #5 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- I don't think so. That could cause future regressions if new found statuses are added. For example, there used to be a found status of 'F' for 'Finished' ( from before the existence of the old_reserves table iirc ). We never want to include any type of found hold when calculating a new hold's priority, set there is no need to list everything as a special case. (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #4) > Don't you think it's safer to test the 'T' value? > Something like > > if ( defined $res->{found} > and ( $res->{found} eq 'W' or $res->{found} eq 'T' ) ) > { > $count--; > } -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
