Hi, On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Chris Nighswonger <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this the time to bring these and other threads back to the table and move > forward with a concrete decision rather than going at it piecemeal?
Given Robin's announcement that he's adopting the Koha namespace for his accounts rewrite, I think we actually have, or are about to have, something more concrete. Obviously, we could turn this into a discussion of adopting a particular framework, but given that those discussions have historically not been productive in terms of producing much code, I think we're best off just setting some broad guidelines, seeing what emerges in upcoming patches, *then* deciding if we want to adopt a particular framework. Is this putting the cart before the horse? Perhaps, but I think we're better off coding some prototypes instead of risking endless discussion. To make this more explicit: we have time before coding for 3.6 *really* kicks off to do some experimentation collectively. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton [email protected] _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
