+1 from me too. The XSLT is done so that only information in your records shows up. I don't see why people would not want that.
Katrin * Jared Camins-Esakov ([email protected]) wrote: > Paul, > > My vote will surprise no one. > > > in my opinion, it would be nice to have > > > > 1) an eventually huge XSLT file. It's probably easier for most > > people to comment out or tweak things that are already there than to > > add the "extra" fields they need from scratch. > > +1 > > The other option would quickly make it impossible for people who are > concerned about MARC display (people like me, for example) to contribute > what you call "bugfixes". I use fields most other libraries do not, so my > stylesheets will diverge. Also, I would argue that not displaying as > called for in bib standards *is* a bug. +1 from me also I think following the standard for display (even if I think the standard is mental, it is the standard) is the way to go here. > > > > 2) a "local" XSLT file that survives updates unharmed where people > > can put the files they tweaked to their likings (I think this was > > talked about while ago, I don't know if it exists already). > > This would be nice, but at present it is not possible, and I don't think > anyone is working on it. > Not actively, but there are specs, look for something in the new year! Chris -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
