Owen wrote: > If someone want to write that, it's fine with me. It's a little over > my head. That still leaves open the question of whether there is a > course of action for getting this tested an approved which will be > timely enough to make it worthwhile.
That is an interesting question in general too. If we have community consensus on some kind of change (before programming started) resulting in "time-sensitive" patches, could we have some procedure to get them on a priority lane through signoff and QA? This would probably involve not only consensus on the changes but also the promise for a quick signoff from other members. Opening up a more general discussion? _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
