Hi Paul, all > Seeing if it can break something requires a lot of experience with Koha code > source. When I QA code from BibLibre, I'm not biaised because it comes from > BibLibre. Are you sure? Just looking at your statement from outside BibLibre, I would say that there could be conflicting interests here.. (With all due respect !)
> Should we, then, give a grant to some specific, experienced & trustable ppl > to QA ? Isn't that already the case? Or do you feel that we should extend the QA team? If we dissolve it on the other hand and grant a new QA privilege to say 15 developers, it may just be a little too optional/non-committal. Would that really be more productive? > For example, the eclipse foundation has "contributors" and "committers". >From first glance, I suspect that we compare two non-similar workflows. Marcel _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
