* Marcel de Rooy ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi Paul, all, > > > * Release the 3.X.0 saying it's a beta, could have some bugs not detected. > > The 3.X.1 being a RC, and the 3.X.2 being the 1st really stable version. > +1 for this second option. You could say that it makes more formal what one > could already suspect about a 3.X.0 release.. No real change in workflow.. > (3.X.1 being stable might be nice too :-)
I think I prefer the first option, or at least that is what we should be aiming for. Aiming for a stable release at the .1 or .2 level will mean it wont be stable until .3 or .4. But as the elected release manager for 3.10.0 it's your call, and I will work with whatever you decide. I think this is also a good time to start thinking about 3.12.x http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Roles_for_3.12 Chris -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
