Le 24/10/2012 11:52, Chris Cormack a écrit : > And if they are patch specific then on the bug itself makes more sense.
> I'd definitely like to see any qa discussions public, but I don't see > the need for a new list .. am I missing something? Everybody says +1 to your counter-proposal, but we already have a koha-translate mailing list, dedicated to translation questions. And a koha-zebra one that is almost unused, but exist. The goal is just to separate different things in different mailing lists. Not a big deal, and I'm a little bit surprised that this idea create some trouble ! (I would have understood if we'd requested a private QAers-only mailing list, but for this request, really, I don't understand why it's argued ! ) Anyone interested could subscribe to this one as well, that's not harder than adding [QA] to QA related threads on koha-devel. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
