On 26 November 2012 23:13, Paul Poulain <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 26/11/2012 10:34, Chris Cormack a écrit : >>> Until now, we said the QA goal was to be concentrated on code quality, >>> testing the feature was made 'somewhere else'. (that's why I also think >>> we could have QA before or after signoff, that's 2 independant things. >>> But I don't see how to achieve that with bugzilla, so I never suggested >>> the idea) >>> >> Hmm I always thought the first sign off was just testing the patch >> works, QA would test for code quality, regressions, etc. > That's what I wrote -in better english probably ;-) -, or am I silly today ? > Not sure, in testing for regressions, you have to apply the patch, test it, and test it breaks nothing else, in effect testing more than the first signoff, not testing less. I thought you were saying that QA just focus on code quality, not whether it breaks something else or not.
Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
