Hi all, rereading this thread again I think we can agree on the following workflow:
If a patch is not passed QA for a longer time, the developer or party can leave a note on the bug or send mail to the mailing list as a gentle nudge to the other QA team members. If a patch is not passed QA for one month, then the patch can be QA'd by the same party. This doesn't mean of course that the RM can still ask for a second sign-off for a big feature or something he worries about. I am going to add this to the wiki. Katrin _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
