Hi, On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Paul Poulain <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be our first step to a full support of FRBR : biblio(items) > containing only "basic" information, that are absolutely required > everywhere and that should not require any meta-data decoding while the > biblio_metadata would contain the raw record. > The metadata_type telling how it must be accessed.
And in particular, what I have in mind is that metadata_type would represent the applicable schema (and perhaps serialization), e.g., for what Koha supports now, the list of metadata types would be something like: marc21-marcxml unimarc-marcxml normarc-marcxml Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: [email protected] direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
