> huh?, what is 'not nice' about describing a test, that proves a bug > is impossible?
It doesn't "prove" it's impossible. It just shows you're not seeing that bug and suggests a way to confirm/reject the bug elsewhere. Proofs are sort of an interesting concept in programming and are almost never used. This exchange was a bad reminder of the time there was some strange MacOS X perl maths bug which caused a particular added-by-request-of-a-now-gone-koha-developer HTML::Template feature to fail. That developer insisted the bug was impossible, that his new template feature was brilliant and that it should be used on almost every Koha page. He was generally quite scathing about how stupid we were for suggesting such a bug existed, especially in private. It wasn't nice, or necessary. I agree that automatic upgrade bug seems unlikely, but impossible? Nope. Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
