Thanks
I will try to work on that if I have time enough.
Mathieu
Le 20/09/2013 17:53, Galen Charlton a écrit :
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Mathieu Saby
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
As performance issue on search or circulation would be more
harmful that performance issue on acquisition module, what about
- keeping the deleted* tables
- adding a new column "detetedbiblionumber" in aqorders
- editing some subs in C4 for taking into using deleted records as
well as existing one
- (maybe doing the same work for deleteditems)
Works for me.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Manager of Implementation
Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell: +1 404-984-4366
skype: gmcharlt
web: http://www.esilibrary.com/
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org &
http://evergreen-ils.org
--
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
