Hi, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Paul A <[email protected]>wrote:
> Is there any operational overhead (apart from disk storage) penalty from > having unused perl packages installed? (I've googled around, but have not > found any real answer.) > No. > In other words, for sandbox use, looking at all versions say from 3.8 up, > should unused packages be removed for testing comparative efficiency, > speed, etc of a single version? > No. > Are there any packages where "older" perl is required for "older" Koha? > Not at present, and although it's not completely under our control, hopefully we'll never run into this in the future. > If not (and I get the impression that there is probably nothing > detrimental), is there a "master" list of all perl modules across the Koha > spectrum? Or is this an impossible dream? > A list of Koha's Perl dependencies has been maintained for years, actually, and is to be found in the file C4/Installer/PerlDependencies.pm in the source tree. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: [email protected] direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
