> The question is : is it good or not to have a way to find information > anywhere in a record, really anywhere, whatever the field or subfield? I would favor: anywhere=all specific indexes. "Really anywhere" will cost more and will perhaps index fields that you do not even want to index. It should always be possible to exclude a field from indexing.
> In fact it raises a second question: even if it is usefull for staff to > have a broad (on all specific indexes) or even a broader (on all fields > of the record) index, it is a good thing that this index is used in OPAC > simple search ? > I believe not. Because some data are not made to be searched by an > average user, and can even make a precise search on a subject more > difficult. I agree. > PS : I'm leaving my position the 6th of december, and I won't work > anymore on Koha in 2014:-( . So I will probably "un-assign" soon the > bugs I am currently responsible for in Bugzilla. Too bad for Koha, Matthieu. But have success. Marcel _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
