Le 09/12/2013 21:25, Kyle Hall a écrit :
I can say Jonathan has pretty much summed up my feelings and
experience as well.
I think even now the vast majority of sign-offs are still done by
developers. I try to balance my community work between sign-offs and
qa'ing.
I think the answer to the RM bottleneck is to push more work to the
module maintainers.
1) MM pushes patches to each respective module branch
2) RM pulls from these branches to master
Of course, there is a higher likelihood for merge conflicts, but I see
no way around that, except to allow MMs to push to master.
As for the SO bottleneck, I see know answer except for more
encouragement for the end-users to test and sign-off, as well as
absolutely clear, step-by-step test plans.
Hi
Having been on the both sides for 1 year and half ("customer" and
patch-tester), I agree too with most of Jonathan's remarks.
For example, when your companies secure a contract with a new customer,
do you make a demonstration of bugzilla and sandboxes ?
And, in the different countries where you have contracts, do libraries
using Koha organize meetings or local hackfest ? In France we try to do
that, and even if it's not yet perfect, but I think the results are
globally positive.
Regards
Mathieu
Kyle
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
--
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
