On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:51:56AM +0200, Paul POULAIN wrote: > Wojciech Zatorski a écrit : > > btw: using Koha without mod_perl is biiiig efficiency mistake.. ;) > > does it mean you use Koha 3.0 with mod_perl currently ? and you don't > have any problem with it ? That would be good to know... > (not that you should have problems, but in koha 2.2, there were some, > due to some Perl non clean programming)
I would lean towards making Koha FastCGI compatible, rather than mod_perl compatible. FastCGI is a much more flexible solution (can still be run as normal CGI, or with many webservers as FastCGI), and from what I have heard, ends up using less memory and CPU than mod_perl. -kolibrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
