Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as we (BibLibre) are concerned, even though it was talked about > a while back, we are in fact not candidate for the QA management > position in 3.2. So the position is indeed open: anyone volunteering ?
Joshua may be a volunteer; I'll let him toss his hat in the ring directly if he chooses. But going beyond the QA position, I would be interested in setting up a mechanism for distributing the review and signoff of important patches across as many contributors as are willing to do it, which might ease the burden on the QA manager a bit. > But I'm really willing to be Release Maintainer for 3.0. Great. What are your plans (roughly speaking) for maintaining 3.0.x? > We fully support what Chris said about the roles being spread around as many > organisations as possible. > By the same token we support his candidacy to be the translation manager. As do we. > But I also think we should be clear about what those positions would mean. > Specifically, these roles (Q&A, RM for 3.1, RMaint for 3.0, > Translation) should have ssh access to the git repository via a key so > that they can do what their position requires them to do, with > sign-off of their commits so that RM can be informed in real time of > what has been done. This can be done on a branch-by-branch basis. In other words, we can set it up so that the 3.0 maintainer can push directly to the 3.0.x branch. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Research & Development, LibLime [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 skype: gmcharlt _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
