Andrew Moore a écrit : > So far, they have consisted only of these emails I've been sending out > from git. They contain a "0" patch that contains no code, but just > documentation. Then the patches show the creation of the C4::Schema > object and a few examples of how we could use it. > > Now that it is looking more likely that this project is viable, > perhaps I need to start a wiki page for it and capture some of these > ideas and concerns in a little more permanent fashion. I only have > time to work on this type of project on Fridays, so look for that this > Friday. Feel free to start it or add to it if you would like. > > Thanks for your help, > -Andy > Hi you are doing a great job documenting and investigating. Thank you. I still had no time investigating or testing. But I am very glad of such a plan to get an ORM in Koha.
Looking at the page you link to on wiki in terms of performances, I can see that RDBO seems to be a quicker ORM than DBIC. And we already have some performance issue on Circulation. Have you considered this alternate ORM which I have come across only some days ago ? Or will we have to use DBI, which is still 8 times faster (according to the tests http://code.google.com/p/rose/wiki/RDBOBenchmarksWithDBI ) than DBIC for circulation which is a critical part in Koha ? I donot want to slow down things. But I want to be sure that what we choose is the best alternative to fit our requirements. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel