MJ Ray a écrit :
I suggest that version could be a long number, like in Perl :
N.SSTTVVV : [...]
We are currently in Koha 2.0209001
Perl currently uses x.y.z format, but if it's much simpler to have
N.SSTTVVV, then go ahead.
I agree that having 4 numbers maybe too much. But if we have only 3,
like Perl, then we have only 2 available for public release (as the last
numbers are for developpers DB updates)
So, it means we have :
Koha 3.0, 3.1, 3.2..., 3.15, 3.16,... => same functionnal branch, only
bugfixes & minor changes
Koha 4.0, 4.1,... => next major version
I think this solution is simpler, but it's a big change in our naming
conventions. So let's argue + and - of this solution.
I think I don't care which one we choose finally.
--
Paul POULAIN et Henri Damien LAURENT
Consultants indépendants en logiciels libres et bibliothéconomie
(http://www.koha-fr.org)
Tel : 04 91 31 45 19
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
