Hello world, I have some comment & thoughts about this commit : http://git.koha.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=Koha;a=commit;h=fa480ea4f3e9a8f9db32d9fe06399766cf02ff84
* 152 field for authority type is unused in marc21, so using it is harmless. But it's the correct field for unimarc, so I think we could accept it (as 1xx is the correct place imho)
* why would be need to use summary only in UNIMARC ? The limits of the summary feature are the same in MARC21 & UNIMARC. And for full headings, it does not work 100% correctly in unimarc as well. So let it empty. That's what we say to our customers
* The complete building of authority include some non translatable strings. It's not due to galen commit, but I think we will (in france) see this question thrown back to us quite soon... I don't know how we will solve it atm.
knowing 2 and 3 users can choose to have something translated or something correct from a MARC pov. I know some customers that will prefer one, some prefering the other.
-- Paul POULAIN, consultant senior BibLibre SARL Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : 04 91 31 45 19 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
