Ryan's answer seems apt for searches. To answer Owen's question specifically about Lists a.k.a. Shelves, in my recent patches (that should be pushed up now), I have actually done as Owen suggests and replaced the "Call Number" column with other more relevant data. Call numbers wouldn't necessarily make sense anyway for items across different libraries, anyway.
--Joe Atzberger On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Owen Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > item-level callnumbers are really the only valid type of callnumber, > > since callnumber refers to shelf location and bibs don't have shelf > > location. There's a separate concept of 'classification' that can > > appear at the bib level, but it's really not used very much in > > practice in libraries, other than as a reference point. Shelf browse > > lists, etc., are generated from the item-level itemcallnumber, which > > should always be populated for every item. > > Now take the example of Lists in the OPAC: When you open a list for > viewing, you're looking at a list of titles. If call numbers are only > relevant at the item level, then does it make sense to simply leave out > call number information from the display of Lists? > > -- Owen > > Web Developer > Athens County Public Libraries > http://www.myacpl.org >
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
