++ to this. I think all date ranges should be inclusive, and this is more intuitive behavior.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:52 AM, paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Ferraro a écrit : > > Hi Paul, > > > > Can you please give a more detailed explanation of what this patch is > > fixing, what the problem was, etc.? > It just replace a > by a >= (and < by <=) > when searching on dates, if you say "from XX/XX/XXXX to YY/YY/YYYY", it > means "included" (at least in france... don't tell me it's different in > US...) > > another example : if you let <, then searching acquisitions done today, > means entering tomorrow as date... > > Do you have a bug number? > > > Nope, it's a bug we discovered during a teaching, that I fixed immediatly. > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : 04 91 31 45 19 > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-patches mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-patches > -- Ryan Higgins LibLime * Open-Source Solutions for Libraries Featuring KohaZOOM ILS 888-564-2457 x704
_______________________________________________ Koha-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-patches
