Hi, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Andrew Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Joe Atzberger > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am concerned about the dependency on Mech. It's not an insignificant > dependency, though I think it is pure perl. I don't think it should be > a real dependency, though, because you only need it if you want to > submit test reports. That's not something that most users will want to > do. It's just like Perl::Tidy, which can be used by some tests in the > xt directory. But, I don't think we have a way to keep track of > optional dependencies, though. > > Do you have any thoughts on how we solve this problem gracefully?
Since these modules are (optional) dependencies for the test suite, not optional dependencies for Koha-qua-ILS, for now I suggest keeping track of them in the main Makefile for the test suite, or something that that Makefile refers to. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Research & Development, LibLime [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 skype: gmcharlt _______________________________________________ Koha-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-patches
