Le Tue, 12 May 2009 06:39:27 -0400, Galen Charlton <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi, > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Nahuel ANGELINETTI > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is very strange, because I have not this issue. If I have only > > one field which is mandatory, without any mandatory subfield, and no > > data, the editor don't let me save the record. So I don't know > > what's happening. > > Are there any dependent patches that you may have not sent yet? No, I haven't. > >> [2] When editing authority records, the patch *did* catch when a > >> mandatory field had no content in any of its subfields. However, > >> it goes too far - for mandatory variable control fields (tags < > >> 010) that do not have subfields, it prevents you from saving a > >> record because it can't find any subfields for them, even though > >> those fields by definition don't have subfields. > > > > So, why are they mandatory? > > It's OK for them to be mandatory, but your patch is not testing them > correctly. The point of a variable control field AKA fixed field is > that it does not have subfields, so testing a fixed field looking for > subfield divs is kind of pointless. Oh, I understand, I will send a follow up, to don't check the fields<010 -- Nahuel ANGELINETTI _______________________________________________ Koha-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-patches
