Ian Walls <ian.wa...@bywatersolutions.com> [...] > The major disagreement is with the timeline. The proposal as it stands is > to start working on Koha 3.8 and Koha 4.0 in parallel, with Koha 3.8 > releasing April 2012, and Koha 4.0 releasing Oct. 2012. I feel that going > from Koha 3.8 directly to 4.0 is unwarranted. To my mind, there are many > possible releases between 3.8 and 4.0, like 3.10, 3.12, 3.14 and so forth. > This is supported by the actual database version numbers in Koha: the > current release is actually 3.04.04; the zeros are squashed out for > convenience. [...]
A minor disagreement is with the platform. Paul's proposal seems to be for 3.8 and 4.0 RM, yet there's very little detail on 4.0 because the community discussion hasn't really started: lots of great features suggested, some scary changes, but not much agreed. Let's agree the RM for 3.8 and then when the next release rolls around, then let's see what we want to do then? In general, I'm fine with folding into 3.x progressively. Seems like a good idea. (Now find me more libraries so I can spend more time on it... ;-) ) Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Webmaster, Debian Developer, Past Koha RM, statistician, former lecturer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for various work through http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha