Thank you Henry, I'll try that workaround! Regards, Jason
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 07:45:09 +0000 From: "BOLSHAW, Henry" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Koha] Report schema questions re: mapping biblio.copyrightdate Message-ID: <lo2p123mb20479eaf88f91e9242cac721db...@lo2p123mb2047.gbrp123.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jason We use RDA and have had this issue as well. As a workaround, we have added the 264 field as an additional mapping for biblio.copyrightdate using the ‘Koha to MARC’ mapping tool in the administration module. This seems to work for us although there may be unintended consequences that I’m not yet aware of. Here’s the 19.05 manual entry for Koha to MARC mapping: https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkoha-community.org%2Fmanual%2F19.05%2Fen%2Fhtml%2Fadministration.html%23koha-to-marc-mapping&data=02%7C01%7Cjvasche%40roundrocktexas.gov%7C76ab224805404c3f891c08d7f219c1d2%7Ca33c69e40e384e23b6380d6dd8fd2445%7C1%7C0%7C637244064767786817&sdata=71GyKLGcQAEdcGvL52U63akAEuXwX1YZDgVnuYY9xP8%3D&reserved=0 The manual says “It is possible to link more than one MARC field to a database field. For example, you could link both 260$a and 264$a to the biblioitems.place field.” I hope that helps! Kind regards Henry Henry Bolshaw Systems Librarian Library, House of Lords, London, SW1A 0PW _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
