Hi Thomas,
when you have a 8xx for a traced series, you usually have a 490 with
first indicator = 1 as well.
See:
https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd490.html
https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd830.html
The 490 is also present in your sample record from DNB.
Hope this helps,
Katrin
Not sure what you mean by "490 ind". But the relationship is definitly
not 1:1, but n:1 (i.e. we're linking from a child to a parent)
In this case linking horizontally to the other parts of the series
instead of linking to the set record was chosen by design, assuming it
would make more sense to the user. Especially since untraced series
don't have a set record and the link can only link to the parts.
I think we are using this 830$w to link not horizontally, but
vertically, from a book up to a sort of series ("Reihe"). We're not 100%
sure this is correct, so we copied what DNB is doing (see again these
links):
https://portal.dnb.de/opac/simpleSearch?query=9783847703389
linking via 830$w to
https://portal.dnb.de/opac/opacPresentation?cqlMode=true&reset=true&referrerPosition=0&referrerResultId=%229783847703389%22%26any&query=idn%3D015935620
But it could be changed locally of course as you said by just changing
the index. If you don't want to change the XSLT file this can also be
done quite easily with jQuery in OpacUserJs:
ok, that's another way to correct the param name.
We were just not sure if using 'rcn' instead of 'control-number' was a
bug in Koha or our MARC. It seems it is neither, so we'll use a
workaround to "correct" the param name.
Greetings,
domm
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
