On Friday 05 May 2006 10:32, Petr Gola wrote: > On 5/5/06, Roman Pichlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > proti MySQL hovori napriklad i to, ze budete potrebovat zakoupit > > licenci, pokud budete prodavat vase reseni vcetne teto databaze. > > "MySQL Products are available under the "dual licensing" model. Under > this model, users may choose to use MySQL products under the free > software/open source GNU General Public License (commonly known as the > "GPL") or under a commercial license. ISVs and Resellers, who are > embedding and reselling MySQL as part of their own commercial > solutions, can purchase a MySQL commercial license." > > (http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.0.html) > > Velice zajimave. Ani by me nenapadlo, ze MySQL ma takovou licencni > politiku. Jen by me zajimalo, kde je ta hranice - kdyz to pribalim na > cedecko?:) Btw. pod GPL se svoji aplikaci licencovat nechystam:)
Dualni licencni politiku ma MySQL uz od zacatku, a to z jednoho prosteho duvodu: monty si chtel prijit k par penizkum tim, ze bude delat support a dodelavat na pozadani Cckove vlozene funkce (monty tvrdil, ze vlozene procedury jsou jenom pouhym odvarem slinkovanych Cckovych funkci a IMHO ma pravdu (nebo znate nekoho, kdo za behu dynamicky meni nebo primo generuje vlozene procedury, tedy pouziva jedinou teoretickou vyhodu vlozenych procedur oproti Ccku?)). Co se tyka GPL, tak si nemyslim, ze vasi aplikaci musite pdo ni licencovat - asi tezko bude vasi aplikaci SQL databaze nebo ze budete jinak linkovat MySQL se svymi vlastniky Cckovymi zdrojaky. A kdyby si i nekdo doplnil svoji vlastni funkci, je takovy problem onu funkci licencovat pod GPL a vsechno ostatni prodavat za tucny baksis? -- Oto 'tapik' Buchta, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.buchtovi.cz ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
