+++ Ravineet Singh [16/05/16 11:27 +0200]:
HI,

The patch is the same as in the README, i.e:
--- src.orig/fs/proc/meminfo.c
+++ src/fs/proc/meminfo.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_
       "Committed_AS:   %8lu kB\n"
       "VmallocTotal:   %8lu kB\n"
       "VmallocUsed:    %8lu kB\n"
-       "VmallocChunk:   %8lu kB\n"
+       "VMALLOCCHUNK:   %8lu kB\n"
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
       "HardwareCorrupted: %5lu kB\n"
#endif

and, yes, I see it every time.
The patch/module is loaded via;
kpatch load kpatch_0001_Test_kpatch.ko
and unloaded via kpatch unload


Hi Ravineet,

Thanks for the additional information. Unfortunately I haven't been
able to reproduce the module refcount issue on -rc4. As far as
functionality goes, I wouldn't worry about the warning. We technically
don't support -rc kernels, since those kernels are in active
development and tend to be unstable. FWIW I've tested kpatch on the
latest 4.6.0 stable release, and didn't run into any issues, if you'd
like to try upgrading your kernel.

Jessica

_______________________________________________
kpatch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kpatch

Reply via email to