On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:05:05PM -0800, Stewart Stremler wrote:
> begin  quoting Lan Barnes as of Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:39:48PM -0800:
> [snip]
> > Ha! Hear me? I say HA!
> > 
> > I have never written a successful procmail rule. Not in several tries.
> 
> >From scratch, or you've never gotten a .procmailrc to work at all, ever?
> 

The latter.

> > I'm very discouraged: "Sometimes I feel like an ape." - RF
> 
> Didn't we have a set of "recommended procmail rules" for the KPLUG
> mailing lists somewhere?
> 
> If not, we ought to.
> 

Well then, do it. Oh, it's down ...

> > > Converting to Maildirs is not required at all. You can do that at your
> > > leisure. I still have a lot of mboxs!
> > 
> > I _have_ no leisure. Just lots of mboxes.
> 
> I still use mboxes.
> 
> -Stewart "Avoiding the inode depletion problem" Stremler

I thought we just went to reiserfs for that. Not that I plan to.

Seriously, I had understood that mboxes were prone to corruption,
although I can't say it's ever happened to me.

-- 
Lan Barnes                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist     858-354-0616
-- 

KPLUG-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to