On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:01:17 -0600, Gabriel Sechan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >From: "Neil Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >* Federal immigration law is changed to bar aliens who have "engaged
> >in a terrorist activity" -- they now would be unable to enter the
> >U.S. legally.
> >
> >* The definition of terrorist activity is broadened (for starters, it
> >includes the PLO). It also covers anyone providing "communications" to
> >a organization the U.S. dislikes. Should ISPs be worried?
> >
> 
> I fail to see how the top one is bad, provided they've been found guilt in a
> court of law.

The concern, which I don't necessarily share, but may, is that anybody
and everybody can be added to the terrorism list these days.  A
government's "terrorist" might be a liberal's "freedom fighter",
depending on the situation.

> As for the second-  how int he hell was the PLO not *already*
> a terrorist agency?  Multiple murders through the 80s and 90s wasn't enough?

I thought they were on the lists.  Terrorism training in the Navy (ten
years ago or so) included discussion of the PLO.

-todd
-- 

KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to