[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It seems you can do postfix SSL with and without SASL.
>
> I don't know which choice is better/easier.
SASL is an authentication layer. SSL is an encryption layer. So you
are comparing apples and grapefruits. Which also explains why they are
not mutually exclusive.
The only time SASL is required is if you are using Cyrus, since it
only speaks SASL. Some distribution require it as default, and I
believe most pre-compiled binaries of Postfix are compiled with SASL
support, though you aren't required to use it.
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
"All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies."
-- Dr. John Arbuthnot (1667-1735)
--
KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
