boblq said:
> Your stupid argument could be used against any law that any
> democracy passes that forces someone to do something that
> they do not want to do, which is after all the whole point of laws.
> The fact that changing the law might be difficult, i.e. one cannot
> muster a majority for ones point of view is beside the point.
You might not like my argument, but it's not "stupid". The funding of
the BBC is a "fee for service" arrangement. If you don't want the
service, don't buy it. WHAT THE HELL IS STUPID ABOUT THAT?
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
"All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies."
-- Dr. John Arbuthnot (1667-1735)
--
KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
