Todd Walton wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:58:40 -0800, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The gist of the message: If you do not control the box, or it is not > > under the control of someone you trust, then that system has to be > > considered hostile and untrustable, no matter what you try to do. > > And further: there is an extent to which any system may or may not be > under your (or someone you trust)'s control. The trick being to > figure out to *what* extent any given system under consideration fits > this.
Some call this ``Trusting Trust'' http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ -john -- KPLUG-List mailing list [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
