IBM was develooping a platform called the Workplace OS. The Workplace OS 
allowed a OS run multiple OS's such as AIX, OS/400, OS/2. The Workplace OS ran 
on Mach Kernel (ie OSF/1, developed at CMU (Carnegie Mellon University) )The 
project died due to objections from the AS/400 group. At the time Linux was not 
so prominent at the time so it's quite probable that Linux would have been 
supported.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tracy R Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Has IBM really contributed that much to Linux?
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:36:18 -0800

> 
> I was just reading a couple of links on /. about the history of Windows,
> David Weise, etc.
> 
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/04/1457204&tid=109
> 
> In his latest blog entry he talks about what would have
> happened if Weise had not jumpstarted Windows and MS stayed the course
> with OS/2. He postulates that IBM would never have felt a need to sponsor
> Linux and that Linux would not be where it is today without IBM's help:
> 
> "In my mind, the biggest effect of such a change would be on Linux.
> Deprived of the sponsorship of a major enterprise vendor (the other
> enterprise players followed IBMs lead and went with OS/2), Linux remained
> as primarily an 'interesting' alternative to Solaris, AIX, and the other
> *nix based operating systems sold by hardware vendors."
> 
> But I can't really name a single code or feature or anything really
> obvious that made such a huge difference in my use or enjoyment of Linux.
> I know they have contributed (EVMS is the only thing I can name at the
> moment but I use LVM) but it's not really clear how it has affected me
> (yes, I'm all about ME today!) so I did some digging and found this right
> at the top of google:
> 
> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/
> 
> Click on the patches link on the left. Turns out they have their hands in
> quite a bit of stuff.
> 
> Also lots of interesting comments to this on Osterman's blog.
> 
> --
> Tracy Reed
> http://ultraviolet.org
> This message is cryptographically signed for your protection.
> Info: http://copilotconsulting.com/sig
<< 1.2.dat >>

>
> 
> --
> 
> KPLUG-List mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm


--

KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to