begin quoting Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. as of Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:01:57PM -0800: > > On Mar 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Stewart Stremler wrote: > > >I also like the centralized nature of CVS and SVN, especially at work. > > I use it as an offlinable, centralized source control. That would be nice.
> I do most small things locally, but at the end of the day I do a "darcs > push" up to my main repository machine. > > A really cool thing: you can actually use darcs *and* CVS > simultaneously on the same project, if you want. A "cvs commit" and a > "darcs record" don't actually get in each other's way as long as you > occasionally do them simultaneously on the same files to provide a > common checkpoint. Ah... nice. That's worth looking into. Now to find a haskell compiler for all of my machines... [snip] > I've been pretty happy with CVS access in Eclipse (I'm using 3.0 on OS > X, though). In the package explorer, right click on the project name > and choose the "Team ->" selection to get a full panoply of CVS stuff. I need a faster machine to get Eclipse to play nice. At work I had a 3GHz Linux box, but I never did spend enough time getting Eclipse to load my existing project correctly. > The package explorer even has CVS control of the OpenOffice format of > the Excel project schedule. It even does autolaunch of the schedule > into OpenOffice. Er... I still run StarOffice 5.2 on my main home box. :-/ -Stewart "So? I don't use 99% of the features anyway..." Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
