On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:07:01PM -0800: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:31:20PM -0800, Stewart Stremler wrote: > > > > > > I complained that local access to a CVS repository wasn't supported > > > in eclipse, and was (rather rudely, I thought) dismissed with "we > > > don't do it that way". I offer little hope. > > > > The CVS team was rude to someone??? Naw! Couldn't be! > > Nah. The eclipse folks. :) > > > <Does my dripping sarcasm come through? One reason so many people in OSS > > SCM were praying for SVN to deliver was to get those jerks out of our > > lives.> > > Hm. I've yet to see much of this so-called "rude" behavior. I see more > of it on the SVN side, possibly because I didn't switch camps immediately. > > Mostly I see people come into #cvs and answer newbies questions with > "CVS sucks. You should use SVN." And when I first ventured into #svn > with my dependency issues, I was told to basically suck it up. > > Plus, the SVN documentation was rather patronizing. > > Milage may vary. >
I have never dealt with the SVN camp. Their lead(s) aren't that way at all. It would be sad indeed if the tribe inherited the worst cultural aspects of their ancestors. -- Lan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Guy, SCM Specialist 858-354-0616 -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
