DJA wrote: < snip >
I find it interesting that there has been much more focus on the authentication of the "evidential" document than there ever has been on the veracity of the information contained therein. While it seems there is little doubt that the document is a fake, there has been, so for, no credible or testimonial evidence presented to refute its allegations.
I remember hearing credible people asserting that the content of the memo was false. Of course, you probably wouldn't give it any credence since it came from middle-of-the-road media. If memory serves, I saw it on MSNBC and Fox.
Shouldn't this be in the kooler, which I recently unsubscribed myself from because I couldn't abide the liberal mindset?
Kind regards, Lew
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
