On 4/18/05, Rick Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is Michael Robertson's position that he does not feel
> that security on HIS desktop machine is as important as
> being able to use his computer without having to hassle

Uh, no.

"I defy anybody to tell me why is it more secure to not run as root.
Nobody really has a good answer. They say "oh, yeah, it is!", but it
really isn't."

That's what he said.  He said that running without root privileges is
not more secure than running with them.  You imply that Robertson
recognizes the security concern, but that he's made the choice not to
worry about it for hisself.  That's not what he was saying.  He was
saying there is *no* security concern.  The question specifically
asked of him by the interviewer was whether running everything as root
sets a bad example for novices.  His answer was no.

I agree with Tracy on this one.  A good many of the decisions Linspire
is making are functionally equivalent to what they would be if
Linspire was out to ruin Linux.

> You have already stated your disdain for Michael Robertson
> based on your experience(s) with him and MP3.com and his
> non-tech/geek status.

Ad hominem.

> To you he is just a businessman making a buck off of Linux.

I highly doubt Tracy has a problem with that part.  Especially since
he's a businessman making a buck off of Linux himself.

-todd
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to