-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lan Barnes wrote: > Could I make the argument that in a community (like the internet) that > we are all negatively affected by machines that are easy targets for > spammers?
It was established early on in the thread that end-users are usually assholes who don't care about their fellow netizens and any arguments made that being able to use root to attack other people on the net are void. Unnecessarilly cynical, I say. But that was the argument made. > I think people have a responsibility to keep the internet relatively > uncluttered, and Robertson (did I get that right?) not only isn't living > up to that, he's being arrogant about his failure to do so. Much like me and most of us here, he would probably consider you an idealistic geek who will never make it in business. I mean, he does have (or did) a couple hundred million. Not that it will buy him any real friends. - -- Tracy R Reed http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCZy7b9PIYKZYVAq0RAhG7AJ9BLAGNrcDEXQuxdPO9ojWb5sxW1wCePMIQ k5MoI5HlKU3ugAlnGIhORZE= =SkXl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
