-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robert Donovan wrote: > OO. OO is still good for creating content, which can be put into scribus > documents. The scribus PDFs also come out better when displayed by Adobe
Actually, when it comes to just plain composing/editing text I think vi (or emacs if that's the way you swing) are better. Then paste it into Scribus for layout. I'm really not sure where OO falls into things. The more I learn and agree with the idea of separation of content/presentation the less need I see for a word processor which is really stuck in a nebulous middle-ground where it does neither composition nor layout very well. I really wish more applications would implement vi style key bindings. There needs to be a libvim which you can call from your app which will give all of vim's wonderful text editing abilities to your text editing widget so we don't have to suffer with crummy editing in our GUI email applications, web browsers, word processors, etc. This has long been a complaint of mine, ever since I started entering a lot of text into web apps. - -- Tracy R Reed http://ultraviolet.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCbJYv9PIYKZYVAq0RAsAlAKCEODulTthAghBSPRNfI9lRSs2HBACdF/yN yL+d88jNwCmUF1auCFzaUqQ= =EbrL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
