On 3/21/05, Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > begin quoting Todd Walton as of Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:10:01PM -0800: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:46:55 -0800, Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > -Stewart "MSWindows had DLL hell. OSS has dependency hell." Stremler > > > > I haven't had a dependencies problem for some four years now.
What about caffeine? > Full installs? > > For some reason, to compile the latest Glibc, you *must* be running a > 2.6 kernel. Upgrade, or go away. FINALLY! Thanks. I have been trying to compile Glibc 2.3.5 for a few hours, seeing all kinds of exotic error messages, patiently pasting the error message text into Google to see what comes up. Every error I get rid of, a new one takes its place. I was going to post a message to the KPLUG list, asking for help on this, but I did a search for "glibc" first, and found this post. Is it "official" that you have to be running a 2.6 kernel to compile Glibc, or is that just what people have figured out from trying it on everything else? In all of the Glibc documentation I read, I missed that warning. --Rachel -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
