Todd Walton wrote:
On 5/26/05, Paul G. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I upgraded the HDD in my laptop from a 20GB to a 100GB drive. This
means a new OS install on the new drive.


Any reason you didn't just copy over your existing (working)
installation?  Because it's a laptop and you couldn't have two drives
in there at once maybe?


No. I bought an external USB case for the old drive when I bought the new drive. I also copied all files from the old drive to my other 250GB external HDD (took a REALLY long time on USB 1.0) before I installed the new one.

The reason for the complete re-install was because I had RHEL WS on it and I didn't like it. It was also easy to upgrade many old packages be upgrading the OS. Upgrading to/from RHEL is not a good idea (as I found out), and even though copying Linux from old to new drive is easy, copying the W2K partition and having it work is another thing entirely. As a final not, the larger drive allowed me to partition the drive into 9 partitions instead of the two that were on the 20GB drive - a much nicer and safer (for data) layout.

Now, to give an update on the issue. I went through the list of running services for a third time, disabled several, and the NIC is working. I noticed ipv6tables was running (I did an "Everything" install), and I think maybe that could have been part of the problem. I'll mess with some of the services I disabled tomorrow and see exactly which one caused the problem for future "Oh, I remember this!" reference.

One final note. The 250GB external drive is now far faster than it was under RHEL WS (as reported by hdparm). Really no big surprise.

PGA
--
Paul G. Allen
Owner, Sr. Engineer, Security Specialist
Random Logic/Dream Park
www.randomlogic.com



--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to