> I'm talking about re-releasing it as GPL'd software, so anyone else who > uses the code will be bit by the GPL virus, unless they manage to track > down the original sources (assuming they learn enough about it to look). > > It just reflects the depths to which the GPL advocates will go to > get "all software released under the GPL". This is a problem I have > with the GPL ideology... it wants to infect everything: no variation > allowed (in the long run). Ideology, not practicality, fairness, or > morality, is the driving force.
Are you concerned about BSD software being "vulnerable" to being rereleased as GPL software but *not* concerened about any moocher rereleasing it as proprietary software? CS -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
